Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05435
Original file (BC 2013 05435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-05435

	XXXXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 18 Oct 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a medical condition that occurred during the contested FA, which precluded him from obtaining a satisfactory overall rating.

During the cardio component of the FA the applicant injured his right ankle, which precluded him from obtainin a satisfactory overall rating.  Furthermore,he was never properly briefed on the procedures of reporting an injury to the FA administrator prior to leaving the area.  Had this been briefed according to the AFI, he would have informed the AF administrators of the injury prior to leaving and they would not have entered his socore into AFFMS.  

In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a personal statement, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Conditon Report, and medical records validating his injury.   

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 18 Oct 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory composite score.

On 18 Oct 13, the applicant received an AF Form an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Conditon Report, exempting him from the 1.5 mile run.

IAW AFI 36-2905, dated 21 Oct 2013; states any military member can appeal their Fitness Assessment through a Wing-Level Appeals Board and through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of discovering the error/injustice
 
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander within five days of the assessment.  If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results.  The Airman will then be required to retest within five duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the medical provider and the Exercise Physiologist (EP).

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for void/removal of FA dated 18 Oct 13. Specifically, the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of military records. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation, was forwarded to the applicant on 19 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The application has not exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3.	Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force.  As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction.  The Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this application and indicated there is an available avenue of administrative relief the applicant has not first pursued.  In view of this and since this avenue of administrative relief was available at the time the applicant submitted his application, we find it would be inappropriate to consider this application for adjudication at this level, as there exists a subordinate level of appeal that has not first been depleted.  Therefore, in view of the above, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that he has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to submitting his application to the BCMR; and the application will only be reconsidered upon exhausting all subordinate avenues of administrative relief.  
________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05435 in Executive Session on 21 May 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	XXXXXXXXXX, Chair
	XXXXXXXXXX, Member
	XXXXXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Jun 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 15 Jan 14.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Feb 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03694.docx

    Original file (BC 2014 03694.docx.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the documentation submitted by the applicant, on 16 May 14, the applicant received an AF Form 469, exempting him from the 1.5 mile run, 2km walk, and push-up component until 9 Jul 14. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial based upon the fact that the applicant has not exhausted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00709

    Original file (BC 2014 00709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the removal of the contested FA due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. In this respect, this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force. Exhibit B. DD Form 149, dated 24 Mar 14, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04884

    Original file (BC 2013 04884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 but no later than 7 calendar days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete an FSQ does not invalidate the FA. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for void/removal of FA dated 12 Sep 13. In particular, the applicant has provided medical documentation validating that he had a medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01677

    Original file (BC 2014 01677.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Examiner’s Note: In his application the member states that he submits a memorandum from his medical provider and a letter from his commander. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the removal of the contested FA due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. Furthermore, the Board cannot grant reconsideration on this portion of his request unless and until he has exhausted all other avenues of relief.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01997

    Original file (BC 2014 01997.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the removal of the contested FAs due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. Furthermore, the Board cannot grant reconsideration on this portion of his request unless...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00736

    Original file (BC 2014 00736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had a medical condition with his knee, which prevented him from passing the cardio component of the contested FA. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 13, states that any military member can appeal his or her own FA through a Wing-Level Appeals Board and through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of discovering the error or injustice. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02523

    Original file (BC 2014 02523.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a “Medical Determination Letter,” signed by his medical provider and indicating he had a condition that precluded him from passing the FAs dated 4 Jun 12 and 23 Aug 12 and a commander invalidation memorandum, requesting that the FA dated 30 May 13 be removed. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the removal of the contested FAs due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04414

    Original file (BC 2013 04414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04414 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 12 Aug 08, 27 Apr 10, 29 Jul l0, 3 Nov l0, and 24 Apr 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 7 May 12 she was medically evaluated, at the request of her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03849

    Original file (BC 2013 03849.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 Aug 13, the applicant provided a response to the Letter of Counseling (LOC) he was issued as a result of not passing the contested FA. The applicant presents documentation of difficulty with the contested FA due an illness/injury but did not obtain an invalidation letter from his commander. We note the comments of AFPC/DPSIM indicating the applicant should have made the fitness assessment cell (FAC) staff aware that he had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the FA on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02012

    Original file (BC 2014 02012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a “Medical Determination Letter,” signed by his medical provider, which stated that, “he had a documented medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA test.” The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 2013, states that any military member can appeal his or her own FA through a Wing-Level...